Any when is it too stupid one. I bought a Linksys WRT350N Router but extra my Intel 4965AGN wireless map as quickly as possible to operate. Actually I would have to reach almost a classic networking throughput.
Although I am only about 1 meter away from the router I came up with a lousy throughput.
Measured by NETIO:
Packet size 1 k bytes: 2240 KB / s TX, 2325 KB / s Rx.
Packet size 2 k bytes: 2261 KB / s TX, 2528 KB / s Rx.
Packet size 4 k bytes: 2719 KB / s TX, 2501 KB / s Rx.
Packet size 8 k bytes: 2682 KB / s TX, 2699 KB / s Rx.
Packet size 16 k bytes: 2753 KB / s TX, 2662 KB / s Rx.
Packet size 32 k bytes: 2659 KB / s TX, 2688 KB / s Rx.
My LAN looked as something normal.
Packet size 1 k bytes: 11361 KByte / s TX, 11311 KByte / s Rx.
Packet size 2 k bytes: 11364 KByte / s TX, 11310 KByte / s Rx.
Packet size 4 k bytes: 11568 KByte / s TX, 11528 KB / s Rx.
Packet size 8 k bytes: 11566 KB / s TX, 11533 KByte / s Rx.
Packet size 16 k bytes: 11568 KByte / s TX, 11529 KByte / s Rx.
Packet size 32 k bytes: 11613 KByte / s TX, 11568 KByte / s Rx.
The LAN bandwidth should be to achieve but also with a Wi-Fi on this short distances. I have searched and searched, installed new drivers and and and. I thought it would be maybe Windows 7, but in INet I found several references that is the case not only with Windows 7.
Today I have encryption of TKIP AES converted then simply, something I had not yet tried. I have achieved what I wanted to achieve all the time.
Or measured with NETIO:
Packet size 1 k bytes: 9033 KByte / s TX, 9437 KByte / s Rx.
Packet size 2 k bytes: 8950 KByte / s TX, 9689 KByte / s Rx.
Packet size 4 k bytes: 9744 KB / s TX, 9873 KByte / s Rx.
Packet size 8 k bytes: 9641 KByte / s TX, 9996 KByte / s Rx.
Packet size 16 k bytes: 9552 KB / s TX, 9932 KByte / s Rx.
Packet size 32 k bytes: 9734 KByte / s TX, 10031 KByte / s Rx.
Comes but very close to the classic 100Mbit LAN.
PS: to make the switch of TKIP AES encryption on the router.
Abonnieren